Scope Ratings GmbH (Scope) has taken the following rating action on the notes issued by Andor SPV S.r.l.:

Class A (ISIN IT0005573834), EUR 208,000,000: rated BBB+_SF

Class B (ISIN IT0005573842), EUR 40,000,000: not rated

Class J (ISIN IT0005573859), EUR 5,000,000: not rated

Transaction overview

The transaction is a static cash securitisation of an Italian non-performing loan (NPL) portfolio with total due amount (i.e. gross book value or GBV) of around EUR 1,318m. The portfolio was sold by Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A and will be serviced by Intrum Italy S.p.A. as special servicer and by Banca Finanziaria Internazionale S.p.A. as master servicer. The issuer is entitled to all portfolio collections received since the cut-off date of 31 March 2023.

The securitised pool is composed of unsecured loans for a share of 50.7% of the portfolio’s GBV and of senior secured loans for a share of 43.8% of the portfolio’s GBV. Remaining exposures are junior secured loans (5.5% of the portfolio’s GBV). Loans were granted mainly to corporate debtors (71.8% of the GBV). Secured loans are backed by first lien mortgages on residential and non-residential properties (53.9% and 46.1% of the total property value, respectively). Properties are concentrated in the north of Italy (48.1%) followed by southern (29.3%), and central (22.6%) regions. Asset information reflects aggregation by loans and Scope’s pool adjustments related to collections and sold properties since the cut-off date.

The structure comprises three classes of notes with fully sequential principal amortisation: senior class A, mezzanine class B, and junior class J. Class A will pay a fixed rate of 4.25%. Class B will pay a floating rate indexed to three-month Euribor, plus a margin of 10.0%. The Euribor component of class B interest is subordinated to the repayment of class A notes if positive. Class J principal and interest are subordinated to the repayment of the senior and mezzanine notes.

Rating rationale

The rating is primarily driven by the expected recovery amounts and timing of collections from the portfolio. The recovery amounts and timing assumptions consider the portfolio’s characteristics, the servicer’s recovery strategy, as well as Scope’s economic outlook for Italy and its assessment of the special servicer’s capabilities. The rating is supported by the structural protection provided to the notes, the absence of equity leakage provisions and the liquidity protection.

The rating also addresses the issuer’s exposure to key counterparties, with the assessment based on counterparty substitution provisions in the transaction and, when available, Scope’s ratings or other public ratings on the counterparties.

Key rating drivers

High share of recent valuations (positive). Around 60% of valuations were conducted in 2023, meaning asset values are likely to incorporate the current liquidity risks and recent price fluctuations of the real estate market.¹

Geographic concentration (positive). A material portion of the portfolio’s first lien collateral is concentrated in the North of Italy (48% of first lien GBV). Northern regions are economically more dynamic and have generally more efficient courts compared to southern regions.¹

Below average seasoning of the unsecured loans (positive). Weighted average seasoning of the securitized unsecured loans is 2.4 years, which is lower if compared with peer transactions rated by Scope.¹

Significant portion of unsecured loans (negative). The securitised portfolio has a material share of unsecured loans (50.7% of GBV). For unsecured loans, recovery rates are typically lower compared to secured loans.¹

High share of legal procedures at initial stage (negative). Around 78% of the secured loans (in terms of GBV) are in the initial legal phase or are yet to have proceedings initiated. This results in a longer expected time for collections than for loans in more advanced phases.¹

Rating-change drivers

Servicer overperformance (upside). Servicer performance exceeding Scope’s expected collection amounts could positively impact the rating.

Economic slowdown (downside). A slowdown of the Italian economy driven by persistent inflationary pressures combined with tighter monetary policy, and the potential deterioration of borrowers’ affordability conditions could impair servicers’ performance on collections.

Quantitative analysis and assumptions

Scope analysed cash flows, reflecting the transaction’s structural features, to calculate each tranche’s expected loss and weighted average life. Scope analysed the assets and derived a rating-conditional cash flow projection of gross recoveries for the portfolio of defaulted loans.

Scope performed a specific analysis for recoveries, using different approaches for secured and unsecured exposures. For senior secured exposures, collections were mainly based on the most recent property appraisal values, which were stressed to account for, appraisal type, liquidity and market value risks. Scope derived recovery timing assumptions using line-by-line asset information, detailing the type of legal proceeding, the respective court, and the legal stage of the proceeding at the portfolio’s transfer date. For unsecured and junior secured exposures, Scope used historical line-by-line market-wide recovery data on defaulted loans and considered the special servicers’ capabilities when calibrating lifetime recoveries. Scope considered that unsecured and junior secured borrowers were classified as defaulted for a weighted average of 2.4 years and 3.6 years, respectively, since cut-off date. Scope accounted for the current macro-economic scenario, taking a forward-looking view on the macro-economic developments.

For the class A notes analysis, Scope assumed a gross recovery rate of 23.9% over a weighted average life of 5.3 years. By segment, Scope assumed a gross recovery rate of 39.4% for the senior secured portfolio and 11.8% for the unsecured and junior secured portfolio.

For the class A notes analysis, Scope has applied an average combined security value haircut of 60.0%, which consists of i) an average fire-sale discount (including valuation type haircuts) of 52.7% to security valuations, reflecting liquidity or marketability risks; and ii) property price decline stresses (15.4% on average), reflecting Scope’s view of market volatility risk.

In its analysis, Scope considered transaction’s servicer fees structure and assumed legal expenses to be around 7% of lifetime gross collections. Scope captured single asset exposure risks by applying a haircut of 16.7% on the expected recovery rate of the 10 largest borrowers in the class A analysis.

Sensitivity analysis

Scope tested the resilience of the rating against deviations in the main input parameters: the portfolio recovery-rate and the portfolio recovery timing. This analysis has the sole purpose of illustrating the sensitivity of the rating to input assumptions and is not indicative of expected or likely scenarios.

The following shows how the results for class A change compared to the assigned credit rating in the event of:

• a decrease in secured and unsecured recovery rates by 10%, minus two notches.
   
• an increase in the recovery lag by one year, minus one notch.

Rating driver references
1. Loan-by-loan data tape of the securitised pool (Confidential)

Stress testing
Stress testing was performed by applying Credit-Rating-adjusted recovery rate assumptions.

Cash flow analysis
Scope Ratings performed a cash flow analysis of the transaction with the use of Scope Ratings’ Cash Flow Structured Finance Expected Loss Model Version 1.2 incorporating relevant asset assumptions and taking into account the transaction’s main structural features, such as the instruments’ priority of payments, the instruments’ size and coupons. The outcome of the analysis is an expected loss rate and an expected weighted average life for the instruments based on the generated cash flows.

Methodology
The methodologies used for this Credit Rating (Non-Performing Loan ABS Rating Methodology, 3 August 2023; Counterparty Risk Methodology, 13 July 2023; General Structured Finance Rating Methodology, 25 January 2023), are available on https://scoperatings.com/governance-and-policies/rating-governance/methodologies.
The model used for this Credit Rating is (Cash Flow Structured Finance Expected Loss Model Version 1.2), available in Scope Ratings’ list of models, published under https://scoperatings.com/governance-and-policies/rating-governance/methodologies.
Information on the meaning of each Credit Rating category, including definitions of default, recoveries, Outlooks and Under Review, can be viewed in ‘Rating Definitions – Credit Ratings, Ancillary and Other Services’, published on https://www.scoperatings.com/governance-and-policies/rating-governance/definitions-and-scales. Historical default rates of the entities rated by Scope Ratings can be viewed in the Credit Rating performance report at https://scoperatings.com/governance-and-policies/regulatory/eu-regulation. Also refer to the central platform (CEREP) of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA): http://cerep.esma.europa.eu/cerep-web/statistics/defaults.xhtml. A comprehensive clarification of Scope Ratings’ definitions of default and Credit Rating notations can be found at https://www.scoperatings.com/governance-and-policies/rating-governance/definitions-and-scales. Guidance and information on how environmental, social or governance factors (ESG factors) are incorporated into the Credit Rating can be found in the respective sections of the methodologies or guidance documents provided on https://scoperatings.com/governance-and-policies/rating-governance/methodologies.

Solicitation, key sources and quality of information
The Rated Entity and its Related Third Parties participated in the Credit Rating process.
The following substantially material sources of information were used to prepare the Credit Rating: public domain, the Rated Entity, the Rated Entities’ Related Third Parties, third parties and Scope Ratings’ internal sources.
Scope Ratings considers the quality of information available to Scope Ratings on the Rated Entity or instrument to be satisfactory. The information and data supporting the Credit Rating originate from sources Scope Ratings considers to be reliable and accurate. Scope Ratings does not, however, independently verify the reliability and accuracy of the information and data.
Scope Ratings has received a third-party asset due diligence assessment/asset audit. The external due diligence/asset audit was considered when preparing the Credit Rating and it has no impact on the Credit Rating.
Prior to the issuance of the Credit Rating action, the Rated Entity was given the opportunity to review the Credit Rating and the principal grounds on which the Credit Rating is based. Following that review, the Credit Rating was not amended before being issued.

Regulatory disclosures
The Credit Rating is issued by Scope Ratings GmbH, Lennéstraße 5, D-10785 Berlin, Tel +49 30 27891-0. The Credit Rating is UK-endorsed.
Lead analyst: Rossella Ghidoni, Director.
Person responsible for approval of the Credit Rating: David Bergman, Managing Director.
The Credit Rating was first released by Scope Ratings on 18 December 2023.

Potential conflicts
See www.scoperatings.com under Governance & Policies/Regulatory for a list of potential conflicts of interest disclosures related to the issuance of Credit Ratings.

Conditions of use / exclusion of liability
© 2023 Scope SE & Co. KGaA and all its subsidiaries including Scope Ratings GmbH, Scope Ratings UK Limited, Scope Fund Analysis GmbH, and Scope ESG Analysis GmbH (collectively, Scope). All rights reserved. The information and data supporting Scope’s ratings, rating reports, rating opinions and related research and credit opinions originate from sources Scope considers to be reliable and accurate. Scope does not, however, independently verify the reliability and accuracy of the information and data. Scope’s ratings, rating reports, rating opinions, or related research and credit opinions are provided ‘as is’ without any representation or warranty of any kind. In no circumstance shall Scope or its directors, officers, employees and other representatives be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental or other damages, expenses of any kind, or losses arising from any use of Scope’s ratings, rating reports, rating opinions, related research or credit opinions. Ratings and other related credit opinions issued by Scope are, and have to be viewed by any party as, opinions on relative credit risk and not a statement of fact or recommendation to purchase, hold or sell securities. Past performance does not necessarily predict future results. Any report issued by Scope is not a prospectus or similar document related to a debt security or issuing entity. Scope issues credit ratings and related research and opinions with the understanding and expectation that parties using them will assess independently the suitability of each security for investment or transaction purposes. Scope’s credit ratings address relative credit risk, they do not address other risks such as market, liquidity, legal, or volatility. The information and data included herein is protected by copyright and other laws. To reproduce, transmit, transfer, disseminate, translate, resell, or store for subsequent use for any such purpose the information and data contained herein, contact Scope Ratings GmbH at Lennéstraße 5 D-10785 Berlin.