Announcements

    Drinks

      EU’s revised fiscal rules would cut public investment
      MONDAY, 19/02/2024 - Scope Ratings GmbH
      Download PDF

      EU’s revised fiscal rules would cut public investment

      The EU’s revised fiscal rules are inadequate with respect to high green, digital and defence investment needs and would result in significant fiscal adjustments and cuts in public investment at a time when the economic growth outlook is already weak.

      Download the full report here.

      “The rules continue to focus on countries’ individual fiscal positions, with each country’s progress evaluated by growth in net primary expenditure. They remain incomplete as a truly European fiscal framework, which should also consider the creation of a permanent fiscal capacity to provide EU-wide public goods,” said Alvise Lennkh-Yunus, Head of Sovereign and Public Sector Ratings.

      Significant fiscal adjustments needed to comply with EU’s revised fiscal rules

      Source: Bruegel Institute estimates, Scope Ratings debt projections. Average annual fiscal adjustments over four-year consolidation plans

      The fiscal rules remain highly complex but while there may be more flexibility this is unlikely to result in greater compliance, although continued eligibility for the ECB’s Transmission Protection Instrument could provide an important incentive.

      “Overall, we expect EU member states’ fiscal consolidation paths to continue to be informed by investor and rating agency assessments of their credibility rather than relying solely on compliance with the EU’s revised fiscal rules,” Lennkh-Yunus said, adding that credible fiscal rules are an important institutional anchor and inform Scope’s sovereign rating decisions. “Our analysis considers fiscal policy credibility together with projected public-debt dynamics so complying with credible fiscal rules is credit positive,” he added.

      The new rules only partially meet the objectives of creating a simple, flexible and credible framework that is better than the existing framework. On simplicity, replacing the “structural deficit” as a control variable with net primary expenditure is positive as it will reduce controversies around the unobservable “structural deficit” and the “output gap”.

      As for flexibility, individual adjustment plans and their possible extension present uncertain outcomes. “While they may incentivise growth-enhancing reforms and investments, which support sovereign ratings, they also give member states enhanced flexibility to postpone and deviate from necessary fiscal adjustments, which may prove credit negative,” Lennkh-Yunus said. “Credibility and effective compliance are unlikely to improve and might even weaken.”

      Make sure you stay up to date with Scope’s ratings and research by signing up to our newsletters across credit, ESG and funds. Click here to register.

       

       

      Related news

      Show all
      Scope affirms Poland’s A rating and maintains the Stable Outlook

      26/7/2024 Rating announcement

      Scope affirms Poland’s A rating and maintains the Stable Outlook

      Scope completed a monitoring review on Ukraine

      26/7/2024 Monitoring note

      Scope completed a monitoring review on Ukraine

      Scope has completed a monitoring review on the Republic of Georgia

      26/7/2024 Monitoring note

      Scope has completed a monitoring review on the Republic of ...

      Scope has completed a monitoring review for the Republic of Slovakia

      26/7/2024 Monitoring note

      Scope has completed a monitoring review for the Republic of ...

      Scope affirms the People’s Republic of China’s A credit ratings, maintains Stable Outlook

      26/7/2024 Rating announcement

      Scope affirms the People’s Republic of China’s A credit ...

      Scope affirms Serbia’s BB+ ratings and revises Outlook to Positive

      26/7/2024 Rating announcement

      Scope affirms Serbia’s BB+ ratings and revises Outlook to ...